Get in touch with us
Send us an e-mail
Question
Community Bank is planning to improve customer service at its drive-in facility by reducing waiting and transaction times. Observations of the existing single-teller window reveal that customers arrive according to a Poisson process at an average rate of 10 per hour, and that they are given first-come first-served service with an average transaction time of 5 minutes. Transaction times are exponentially distributed. The cost of keeping a customer waiting in queue is represented as a $5-per-hour loss of goodwill.
The bank is considering the following two improvement options.
(A)The bank can lease high-speed information-retrieval and communication equipment that would cost $20 an hour. The new equipment would reduce the average
transaction time by one minute. Assume that the transaction times are still exponentially distributed with the leased equipment.
(B)The other option is to add another teller and to install four remote stations with pneumatic tubes running from the stations to the tellers, who are located in a glassed-in
building. The hourly cost of a teller is $10. (The teller is paid regardless whether he/she is idle or not. Ignore the cost for installing the pneumatic tubes, which are
systems that propel cylindrical containers through a network of tubes by compressed air or by partial vacuum.)
a) Assume that each teller is assigned to two stations exclusively, and that demand is divided equally among the stations (i.e., each station gets 25% of the demand), and
that no customers can switch lines. What is the hourly cost savings now?
b) But now both tellers work all the stations and the customer waiting the longest is served by the next available teller. What is the cost saving now?
c) What concept of queuing theory explains the difference between a) and b)? Overall, what solution do you recommend for the bank and why?
Summary
This question belongs to Operations management and discusses cost savings concepts in queuing theory for given company.
Total word count: 76
Download Full Solution
Thank you so much guys…!!! The final product was very precise, thorough and was far beyond what I expected for. It’s simply awesome and best part is that I got top grades in the assignment. I am very grateful to TheReliableTutor.com.
Believe it or not I used to get C or D in my chemical engineering assignments. So when the chapters of distillation came I was really worried. But with the help of HwA, I started getting a B or an A. Then gradually when it came to the kinetics of solids, I passed with straight “Aâ€s"
I had difficulty in understanding the quantitative chemistry assignment. The assignment expert at HwA helped me understand the topic in a lucid manner and also guided me to write the quantitative chemistry assignment in a way that fetched me an A!
My story with HwA started on a mid-term day, during my graduation as I was stuck with an economics assignment solution. From then onwards I constantly have obtained help from HwA and they have never disappointed me ever.
I had to submit 7 pages essays due in 2 days. TheReliableTutor.com made it possible without any stress. The assistance was excellent and I really appreciate your hard work. Very much satisfied with the service and I’ll recommend everyone.
Comments
this is a very good website
I have 50 questions for the same test your page is showing only 28
hi can you please help or guide me to answer my assignments. thanks
hi can anyone help or guide me to my assignments. thanks
This solution is perfect ...thanks
Hello Allison,I love the 2nd image that you did! I also, had never heard of SumoPaint, is something that I will have to exolpre a bit! I understand completely the 52 (or so) youtube videos that you probably watched. Sometimes they have what you want, sometimes they don't! However, it is always satisfying when you are able to produce something that you have taught yourself. Great job!Debra 0 likes
Perfect bank of solution.
great !
thanks for the quick response. the solution looks good. :)
thnx for the answer. it was perfect. just the way i wanted it.
works fine.